JSBMHA and HIPPA case study Essay

There be many faults in this scenario that I accept more or less with Jim and Betty. First of all, when you ar dealings with mess who are in a counseling or any suit of therapeutic setting, you devote to be subject to handle this situation with screen and perpetually try to treat your client with gaze and never discuss them outside of the clinical setting.The HIPAA laws are to protect the patients rights so that they scum bag non be given bonnie out to anybody. The only people that can have admittance to the medical files would be someone that is involved in the give care of or needs to have access to them for anyone that is billing, or the insurance company that is nonrecreational for the services that the client is receiving.What areas of the JSBMHA did HIPAA compliance impact, When Jim and Betty were on the job(p) for that company, they had unfortunately talked about specific clients and some relatives of the clients had heard the conversation and also their rel atives names. They had presently gone to the company and talked with their supervisor so he could deal with the employees that had broken the privacy laws. JSBMHA, is an certified agency that works with clients that have psychological, mental, and addictions for drugs. THE clients need to be commensurate to odor safe, cognizeing that their conversations are not talked about elsewhere, unless it is related to their recovery.What Jim and Betty did at the cafeteria is inexcusable. You never get by who is going to be listening in on your conversation when you are in a public place. If the wrong people hear what is being said, you never know what the ramifications could be. If a woman is at a domestic violence shelter and you are talking about what she went through with her ex-boyfriend , not knowing the whole time that the ex is in the booth right shadow you. Right there you have yet mold that women in a grave position. Without withdrawing you have just determine that womans life in jeopardy.3I believe that because of their actions that JSBMHA should suspend both of them for at LEAST twain weeks without pay. I believe with that type of punishment, perhaps both of them will unfeignedly think about what they did and why it was inappropriate. Maybe they should regular(a) write a paper on how their actions were wrong and also be able to see how theyre gossiping put that woman in jeopardy. They need to really understand how their actions can affect new(prenominal) people.